Re: [新聞] 普立茲獎記者調查，美國炸了北溪管線

這人雖然在1970年因為報導美萊村而獲得了普立茲獎，但他後來的許多言行都十分荒謬 包括曾經聲稱美國想用B61轟炸伊朗地下核設施，賓拉登其實沒死等等非常陰謀論的言論 當然我們都沒實際上看過賓拉登的屍體，也不是什麼超級核心小圈圈的成員，所以當然可 以“假定“這個人沒把自己的水準變成跟使用HK01的記者一樣 那麼這個人說的，美國人用C4炸毀管道是不是正確的呢 嗯，讓我們先看看他在自己網站上寫的原文 “The C4 attached to the pipelines would be triggered by a sonar buoy dropped by a plane on short notice, but the procedure involved the most advanced signa l processing technology. Once in place, the delayed timing devices attached to any of the four pipelines could be accidentally triggered by the complex mix of ocean background noises throughout the heavily trafficked Baltic Sea—from near and distant ships, underwater drilling, seismic events, waves and even se a creatures. To avoid this, the sonar buoy, once in place, would emit a sequen ce of unique low frequency tonal sounds—much like those emitted by a flute or a piano—that would be recognized by the timing device and, after a pre-set h ours of delay, trigger the explosives." "On September 26, 2022, a Norwegian Navy P8 surveillance plane made a seemingl y routine flight and dropped a sonar buoy. The signal spread underwater, initi ally to Nord Stream 2 and then on to Nord Stream 1. A few hours later, the hig h-powered C4 explosives were triggered and three of the four pipelines were pu t out of commission. Within a few minutes, pools of methane gas that remained in the shuttered pipelines could be seen spreading on the water’s surface and the world learned that something irreversible had taken place." 這裡是他在講述美國如何炸毀北1,2，用詞不是很難我就不完全翻譯了，簡單來說，美國 人在四根裡面的三根上安裝了C4，這個C4只有在接收到特定音頻，才會爆炸，而且這是個 超級先進的不會被什麼亂七八糟的聲音觸發，而就在事發那天，美國演習的一個P8投下了 一個聲納浮標，那個浮標便往c4發送一個聲波，然後C4收到聲波，就開始計時，延遲幾個 小時之後就炸毀了三根管子 就我個人來說，我是覺得這個說法聽起來很蠢，畢竟為啥會用聲波這種聽起來就不是很適 合當成觸發裝置的東西在水下引爆C4,當然可能有什麼技術可以很精準的接收到聲波然後 啟動計時 另外就我個人而言，北溪爆炸我一直不覺得是美國炸的，且先不說後來的天然氣價格暴跌 ，如果美國想要徹底斬斷，那幹嘛不四根管子全部炸斷？你都能預先好久裝三根管子了， 多裝一根也不廢功夫 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.185.66 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Military/M.1675920134.A.7B0.html