※ 本文轉寄自 ptt.cc, 文章原始頁面
看板movie
標題

[新聞] 爛番茄為保護"彼得潘與溫蒂"隱藏爆米花指

時間
最新2023-05-18 12:35:00
留言577則留言,148人參與討論
推噓144 ( 15713407 )
https://reurl.cc/vkVoDN Peter Pan & Wendy Review-Bombing Causes Rotten Tomatoes to Remove Low Score By Russ Milheim Posted: May 12, 2023 The extremely low audience rating for Disney+ exclusive Peter Pan & Wendy is no longer visible on Rotten Tomatoes. When the project first landed last month, it didn't get the warmest of receptions—though it did land plenty of average reactions. It didn't take long for the movie to become the target of review-bombing, with some audiences claiming that the movie was being "politically correct." Others took aim at the casting, dialogue, and more. Now, it seems that those 5,000+ audience score ratings, which previously sat at 13%, are no more. Peter Pan and Wendy Loses Audience Rating https://images.thedirect.com/media/photos/peterpm.jpg Rotten Tomatoes officially removed the audience rating score of Peter Pan & Wendy on Friday, May 12. Formerly, the audience rating sat at 13%, which was the lowest of all of Disney's live-action remake films. The movie's critic score is currently sitting at 62%. The project was previously a victim of intense review bombing from general viewers. An Unprecedented Move by Rotten Tomatoes Completely removing the audience score from a project is an unprecedented move by Rotten Tomatoes. The closest thing to it was when the site excised a majority of Captain Marvel's view ratings, with its reasoning being that it "identified a bug in the post-release functionality." There has still been no official reason given for the removal. It's important to note that this almost certainly wasn't done because of low numbers. Rather, the choice was almost certainly more linked to the review-bombing and an intense number of bad-faith, inaccurate posts. Review-bombing has always been a tricky problem to deal with, and despite previous efforts to contain them (such as not allowing audience reviews before a movie is released), childish behavior still permeates the industry more often than it should. Maybe Rotten Tomatoes is making steps toward some bigger fix that it intends to announce sooner rather than later. Peter Pan & Wendy is now streaming on Disney+. =========================================================================== 簡單說明一下, 5月12日,爛番茄移除了迪士尼串流平台電影"彼得潘與溫蒂"的觀眾評分欄位, 也就是俗稱的"爆米花指數"。 在移除爆米花指數之前,130名影評給的新鮮指數位於62%,屬於新鮮, 然後超過5000名的認證觀眾給予的評價在13%,相當慘烈。 然而在5月12日,爛番茄移除了代表認證觀眾評價的爆米花指數, 直至目前爛番茄官方並沒有給予合理的解釋與理由。 這是圖: https://images.thedirect.com/media/photos/peterpm.jpg 這不是爛番茄第一次為迪士尼護航了, 2019年的MCU電影"驚奇隊長"上映時,有海量觀眾給予相當低的評價, 讓當時以影評與影迷皆享有高評價跟高容忍為名的MCU電影, 在觀眾爆米花指數創下33%的MCU最低紀錄,(共35000+觀眾評分) 導致爛番茄以"有BUG"、"技術因素"關閉評分一段時間。 自此之後,爛番茄對後續電影皆修改成認證觀眾才能評分的爆米花認證制度, 雖然此舉無法拯救驚奇隊長(目前100000+評分,45%,沒有認證制度), 但後續導致MCU的P4電影認證觀眾評價都維持得不錯, 起到了護航的作用。 同樣地,網飛備受爭議的非洲女王:埃及豔后也被保護起來了, 也是看不到觀眾評分, 看來爛番茄不只保護老鼠,還為了N,全部成為F 不過值得說的是,雖然評分被移除了,觀眾評論的內容則是還留著, 點選進去依然是看得到各則臭這部串流片臭得要死的評論。 ============================================================================ 這是北美的情況, 很多網友,包括我上網站查證之後,反映目前這個移除爆米花指數的措施, 只有IP在美國國內才會生效, 也就是說,我們在台灣其實是看得到數字的。 例如現在彼得潘與溫蒂,爆米花指數降到了12%, https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/peter_pan_and_wendy 而非洲女王埃及豔后的爆米花指數: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/queen_cleopatra 2% XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 可能"技術問題"很快會獲得解決,讓被移除的數字在美國恢復, 然後又會有"更認證"、"更高級"、"更進步"、"更精英"、"更純粹"的高階認證觀眾, 來評分論過,讓數字更好看更和諧,更符合"現代思想", 呵呵~~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.43.29.141 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1683956024.A.3CF.html

577 則留言

ARCHER2234, 1F
笑死,還不如學對岸鎖分

ARCHER2234, 2F
直接關掉有夠蠢的,相當於翻桌認輸

ZoeyDestiny, 3F
2%是史上最慘吧

msnobody, 4F
這操作根本吃到中國口水

mach1210, 5F
知道為啥漫威總是新鮮番茄了吧

swps40309, 6F
一定是歧視

protess, 7F
2%應該超過獵魔士血源了吧

zoizupas, 8F
我真的越來越好奇美人魚的票房了

hide0325, 9F
2% 富春山居圖都比你高吧

haha98, 10F
還好啦 就YT不顯示倒讚一樣 沒看到就當作沒有了

holyseraph, 11F
IMDB的分數也公布了 埃及豔后紀錄片1.2分...

JOPE, 12F
連看都沒看過的人去洗分數只會降低網站的參考價值

keat, 13F
紀錄片卻不遵守史實本來就慘了

s1032kj, 14F
片爛不是片商的問題是觀眾的問題

tiara, 15F
川普救是被這些左派作票弄下台的,因為他說話太直太

tiara, 16F
實在。

hughjetman, 17F
居然還有2%比較不可思議

glacierl, 18F
欲蓋彌彰啊,大家一看到被關閉就知道等於評價穿底XD

roger60801, 19F
搞得跟中世紀基督教一樣,笑死

roger60801, 20F
片商是在教導我們啊,你們這些愚民不了解崇高的理想

roger60801, 21F
還在那邊給我嘰嘰歪歪

Vassili242, 22F
一開始imdb也隱藏黑cleopatra的評分

bij831, 23F
別抬頭

MK47, 24F
笑死 這跟支那有啥兩樣

onetear, 25F
2%真的是值得紀念的數字

hughjetman, 26F
十幾趴也就算了,為了那兩趴的偏激份子搞得自己不

hughjetman, 27F
倫不類到底是何苦

widec, 28F
哀及艷后跟小黑人魚也需要保護

qazxswptt, 29F
拉丁彼得潘 溫蒂阿姨 漆黑叮噹 萌髮船長

scott032, 30F
隱藏起來代表爛到不行 也算一種爛片指數

hawardhsz, 31F
美國被極左綁架後 一些作法越來越像中共 蠻噁心的~

widec, 32F
馬克斯說資本主義走到後來就會變共產主義

AAAdolph, 33F
等不及要看魚人小美上映後的情況了

Greein, 34F
這…你引用的新聞不是已經說了因為成為「Review-bo

Greein, 35F
mbing(評論轟炸)」的標靶嗎?幹嘛不一起翻譯:「

Greein, 36F
It didn't take long for the movie to become the

Greein, 37F
target of review-bombing,

Greein, 38F
with some audiences claiming that the movie was

Greein, 39F
being "politically correct."」。

samsonfu, 583F
跟古代皇帝防民之口甚於防川一樣

samsonfu, 584F
都是刁民想害朕

samsonfu, 585F
自由民主真的退步了

samsonfu, 586F
獨裁思想看別人都是獨裁政權

samsonfu, 587F
左派有道德小粉紅就不會是這種德性了

samsonfu, 588F
美式民主歡樂送行之有年了,說你獨裁該推翻就推翻

samsonfu, 589F
埃及、利比亞、敘利亞都被搞過一次

samsonfu, 590F
是不是民主自由美國說的算

ccjj8, 591F
safe space

windr, 592F
埃及豔后爆米花2,彼得番12,到底拍出了什麼超級大

windr, 593F
爛片阿XDDD

windr, 594F
不過這種一看就知道是髒東西XDDDD

windr, 595F
不用刻意去看有多爛XDDD

arx3721, 596F
很久以前就只能看Metacritics了