※ 本文轉寄自 ptt.cc, 文章原始頁面
[情報] 法律專家對水原涉賭事件的看法
https://tinyurl.com/ytvb6j47 (從reddit登入可免費觀看文章)
LA Times訪問了幾位法律專家對水原涉賭事件的看法
The public so far has only a fragmented picture of the case. But more facts
could emerge in coming days and weeks, legal experts said, as federal
prosecutors try to make sense of competing claims about Ohtani’s money being
used to pay down gambling debts with a suspected illegal bookmaker in
California. One key question — but not the only one — is whether the
Japanese slugger was, as his representatives claim, the victim of a “massive
theft” by his interpreter and right-hand man, Ippei Mizuhara.
一個關鍵的問題是 到底大谷是不是像他律師宣稱的那樣 是被水原偷錢的受害者
Ifrah said high-paid athletes often have staff who handle their business and
financial interests, and sometimes do fall victim to betrayal by those people.
“We get a lot of calls about professional athletes being in some kind of
financial mess because someone close to them accesses their accounts or uses
some sort of authority to access their financial assets,” Ifrah said.
Because of that, the first question he would be asking if he were a
prosecutor on the case, he said, is what kind of access Mizuhara had to Ohtani
’s bank accounts. Ifrah said it would be hard to imagine Mizuhara siphoning
millions from Ohtani in cash — which is what most illegal bookmakers deal
in, if not crypto payments — without Ohtani or his financial managers
knowing or agreeing to it.
“You start to wonder, how was that a ‘massive theft’?” Ifrah said. “How
did someone go and get cash from a bank account or liquidate one of your
financial assets to get cash without you knowing?”
前聯邦檢察官 運彩法專家Jeff Ifrah表示
很難想像在沒有大谷或他的理專知情或同意下 水原還有辦法從大谷身上偷幾百萬現金
"你開始懷疑 這樣算大規模偷竊嗎? 誰有辦法在你不知情下從帳戶拿錢?"
Daniel Wallach, a sports betting and gambling attorney in Florida, agreed
that any disappearance of millions of dollars should have set off alarms for
the people who manage Ohtani’s assets and should have been addressed long
before the media started asking questions.
“The biggest red flag of all is that this pronouncement that there has been
this ‘massive theft’ only occurred in response to the media poking around
— like it was Crisis Management 101 to shift the attention away from Ohtani,
” he said.
Wallach said there are so many unanswered questions and contradictory
explanations from Ohtani and Mizuhara at this point that, in addition to the
federal investigation, MLB has no choice but to launch its own review — in
part to make a decision as to whether Ohtani deserves to be sidelined.
“This requires a full-on investigation because there’s so many
inconsistencies and already deeply troubling facts,” he said. “MLB needs to
get as much information about this as possible early on to make at least a
preliminary assessment as to whether Ohtani should be placed on leave until
the conclusion of an investigation.”
另一位賭博法專家Daniel Wallach同意當幾百萬消失時
管理大谷帳戶的人就該對此警覺
"最大問題是偷竊這說法是在回應媒體時才發生的 就像要幫大谷轉移注意力"
因為大谷和水原的說詞有太多前後矛盾之處
Wallach也督促MLB要盡早展開調查 至少要先確定大谷是否應該暫時停職調查
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 184.191.81.15 (美國)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1711115733.A.7D7.html
249 則留言
abc12812 作者的近期文章
[討論] 科學化訓練是不是忽略降低受傷風險了?
最近幾年所謂科學化訓練盛行 投手球速愈來愈快 能投到95, 100mph的火球投手愈來愈多 但同時受傷開大刀的狀況也變多 最近的新生代投手 Strider手痛要檢查 Bieber則是確定要開TJ 相比起來 以前的訓練方式雖然沒那麼重視球速
17Baseball
[分享] 太空人的投手輪值 簽約金有點Cheap目前太空人隊先發輪值 五位投手的業餘簽約金分別是 Bonus Ronel Blanco 5000 Cristian Javier 10000 J.P. France 1000 Hunter Brown 325000 Framber Vald
42Baseball
[情報] 大谷團隊拒絕回答向哪個機關報案https://tinyurl.com/yyy39bw7 Los Angeles Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani's representatives declined again Tuesday to ans
29Baseball
Re: [新聞] 高薪聘請皇家律師!大谷翔平「時薪付6萬」求全身而退※ 引述《EDFR (元亨利貞)》之銘言: : https://ctinews.com/news/items/JmxNbNXlx8 : 高薪聘請皇家律師!大谷翔平「時薪付6萬」求全身而退 : 記者譚兆青/綜合報導 : 在大聯盟首爾海外賽後,
25Baseball
Re: [新聞] 美媒爆水原一平「學歷造假」! 校方:沒※ 引述《ihcc (超級賭爛紅貴賓)》之銘言: : 美媒爆水原一平「學歷造假」!校方:沒有出席紀錄 : https://www.ettoday.net/news/20240323/2705896.htm?from=ettoday_app
16Baseball
[分享] MLB球員票選最被低估的球員https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-players-survey-who-is-most-underrated 1. Yandy Diaz 1. Jose Ramirez 3. Ozzie Albies 3. Core
推
→
→
→
推
噓
→
推
推
→
推
推
推
→
推
→
噓
推
推
推
→
推
推
→
→
→
推
推
推
→
→
→
→
→
→
推
→
推
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
推
推
→
→
→