Re: [新聞] 水原說詞反覆 記者揭露可能原因

《The Athletics》剛整理了幾個水原案的未解之謎 其中一個觀點在前幾天沒有被特別質疑，但質疑這點也很合理: 如果一平有賭棒球呢? Mizuhara told ESPN he bet on international soccer, the NBA, the NFL and college football, saying, “I never bet on baseball. That’s 100 percent. I knew that rule.” But why should anyone blindly accept the word of a man who renounced his own story? 水原一平告訴ESPN,他賭的是國際足球賽事、NBA、NFL和大學職業足球賽,並說:"我從未賭 過棒球賽,這是百分之一百。我非常了解這條規矩。" 但對於一個自己推翻了最初說法的人,我們為什麼要全盤相信他的話? While Mizuhara said he gambled on only other sports, it is at least possible to imagine him using his inside knowledge to bet on baseball in an attempt to escape his debt. Perhaps the federal investigation of Bowyer will turn up more information on Mizuhara’s gambling choices. Or perhaps the league will need to find out on its own. 儘管水原一平聲稱他只賭過其他運動項目,但我們至少可以想像,他有可能利用內部消息賭 棒球來試圖擺脫賭債。也許聯邦對鮑耶的調查將能獲得更多關於水原一平賭注選項的資訊 。或者,聯盟可能需要自行查明。 - 雖然嘴上說絕對沒賭棒球 但畢竟欠了450萬，而且說法反覆 "一平其實有賭棒球"這件事就變得既有合理性也值得讓人懷疑 好了，假設，假設喔 一平真的有賭MLB棒球比賽，然後大谷因為金流被判定成參與其中 那事情就會變得很麻煩 Rule 21, posted in every major-league clubhouse, clearly outlines the penalties for employees the league finds guilty of such an offense. Bet on a game in which the employee is not involved: A year-long ban. Bet on a game in which the employee is involved: A permanent ban. 規則21張貼在每個大聯盟球隊的更衣室中,清楚列明聯盟發現員工涉及此類違規時將給予 的處分。 賭注涉及非自身所屬比賽:一年禁賽。 賭注涉及自身所屬比賽:永久禁賽。 - 當然全部的前提還是，聯盟會不會用很大的力道去查整件事的真相。 內容資料來源: https://reurl.cc/mrgloM -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 112.78.88.102 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1711107643.A.8BC.html